Three linked views of the same 156-case chronic kidney disease dataset — an individual case atlas, a nested comparative analysis, and a map of critical decision nodes across trajectories.
Individual → Comparative Reading cases one-by-one (Atlas) surfaces very different insights than reading them nested and cross-compared (Analysis) — the same data tells a different story depending on the lens.
Decision Points A small number of recurring decision nodes — timing of referral, RAAS blockade titration, dialysis-start conversations — account for a disproportionate share of divergent outcomes across the cohort.
Staging ≠ Trajectory Two patients with the same eGFR/staging snapshot can be on very different trajectories; the decision-node view is where that distinction becomes visible.
Purpose This suite is a demonstration of moving from individual case review to structured comparative and decision analysis — a workflow pattern, not a validated clinical tool.
Disclaimer: This is a demo/educational exercise built to explore AI-assisted case review and comparative analysis workflows. It is not a validated clinical decision-support tool, is not intended for use in real patient care, and should not substitute for clinical judgment, institutional guidelines, or peer-reviewed evidence. All case data is illustrative. Read the accompanying blog post for context on how and why this was built.