Critically Appraised Topics — focused clinical questions with short evidence-based bottom lines
Compiled 2026 · For learning & personal reference only
Bottom line: Low ferritin (<30 ng/mL) is highly specific for IDA even with inflammation; normal/high ferritin does not rule out coexisting IDA. Raise the threshold (~70–100 ng/mL) when CRP/ESR are elevated.
Bottom line: Ret-He responds faster than ferritin/MCV to iron status changes; useful for early detection, especially in dialysis and pediatric populations.
Bottom line: sTfR is less affected by inflammation and can help confirm IDA in ACD, but cost/availability limit routine use; ferritin remains first-line.
Bottom line: Yes when indices are discordant, cause is unexplained, or hemolysis/marrow failure is suspected — counters can miss schistocytes, blasts, target cells.
Bottom line: Bidirectional endoscopy finds a GI source in roughly one-third to half of adults with unexplained IDA; yield rises with age, especially in men and postmenopausal women.
Bottom line: WHO: Hb <11 g/dL (1st/3rd trimester) or <10.5 g/dL (2nd trimester). Values above this may still reflect suboptimal iron status due to physiologic hemodilution.
Bottom line: Required for diagnosis and severity grading — peripheral counts alone can't confirm hypocellularity or exclude infiltrative marrow disease.
Bottom line: Useful first-pass filter but overlaps substantially between categories (e.g., early IDA can be normocytic) — should not be used in isolation.
Bottom line: Elevated RDW favors IDA over thalassemia trait (usually normal RDW), though overlap exists — confirm with ferritin/hemoglobin electrophoresis.
Bottom line: Yes — direct antiglobulin test (DAT) distinguishes immune from non-immune hemolysis and should be obtained early with LDH, haptoglobin, bilirubin.
Bottom line: Comparable Hb normalization by 8–12 weeks in uncomplicated IDA with adequate absorption/tolerance. IV preferred if oral intolerant, absorption impaired (IBD, post-bariatric), or urgent correction needed.
Bottom line: Improves fractional absorption and reduces GI side effects (hepcidin-mediated), with similar long-term efficacy in repleting stores.
Bottom line: Raise Hb but don't improve mortality/CV outcomes; targeting Hb >13 g/dL increases stroke/thromboembolic risk. Conservative targets (~10–11.5 g/dL) recommended.
Bottom line: Ferric carboxymaltose improves functional status and reduces HF hospitalizations in iron-deficient HFrEF, regardless of anemia status; mortality benefit unproven.
Bottom line: Restrictive strategy (transfuse <7 g/dL) is non-inferior to liberal strategies in most critically ill/stable cardiac patients — less exposure, no mortality increase.
Bottom line: Significantly reduces crisis frequency, acute chest syndrome, and transfusion need, and improves survival long-term. Remains underutilized in practice.
Bottom line: High-dose oral B12 (1000–2000 mcg/day) is as effective as IM, including in pernicious anemia, given adherence. IM preferred if adherence/absorption is uncertain.
Bottom line: Preoperative screening and correction (oral or IV) reduces perioperative transfusion rates and may shorten length of stay, especially in major ortho/cardiac surgery.
Bottom line: Confirm/correct B12 before or alongside folate — giving folate alone in undiagnosed B12 deficiency can mask anemia while neurologic damage progresses.
Bottom line: Mixed evidence; some studies suggest modestly increased risk (dialysis, ICU populations), but overall risk is low and doesn't generally outweigh benefit.
Bottom line: Yes — independently associated with increased mortality and frailty, even at mild severity, when no nutritional/renal/inflammatory cause is found.
Bottom line: Associated with longer length of stay, higher readmission rates, and increased mortality, independent of ejection fraction.
Bottom line: Associated with worse overall survival across most solid tumors, though partly reflects disease burden rather than pure causality.
Bottom line: Severe anemia (and very high Hb) both associate with preterm birth and low birth weight — a U-shaped, not linear, relationship.
Bottom line: Yes — modestly increased risk of both, due to reduced acid-dependent absorption; risk rises with duration of therapy.
Bottom line: Chronic NSAID/low-dose aspirin use increases occult GI blood loss — consider as a reversible contributor during IDA workup.
Bottom line: Modern formulations carry low but real risk (~0.1–0.2% serious reactions); oral iron has no such risk but more GI intolerance.
Bottom line: Yes — increased VTE risk, with some trials raising tumor-progression concerns. Use generally restricted to chemo-induced anemia with conservative Hb targets.
Bottom line: Routine screening not broadly recommended, but incidental IDA in this group warrants GI evaluation given elevated risk of occult malignancy.
Bottom line: Universal screening (≥1x/trimester) is standard given high prevalence and low cost/harm — favored over risk-based approaches, which miss asymptomatic cases.